Documentos depositados recientemente

  • listelement.badge.dso-typeÍtem,
    Entrevista: inteligencia artificial, Big Tech y Regulación: entre la innovación y el control del Gobierno. THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 87 (2025)
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-08-27) Picker, Randal C.
    This article explores the tensions between innovation and democratic control in the regulation of artificial intelligence and Big Tech. While Europe adopts proactive regulatory frameworks like the Digital Markets Act, leveraging its tradition of legal sophistication, the United States maintains a reactive stance, relying on general principles and antitrust litigation. China, in turn, represents a distinct model of centralized governance. The discussion analyzes the limits of current legal tools –such as copyright, antitrust, and agency authority– while questioning whether traditional regulatory justifications remain valid in the digital era. The text also reflects on the ideological and political drivers behind current regulatory trends and raises the challenge of measuring Big Tech power beyond market metrics.
  • listelement.badge.dso-typeÍtem,
    El derecho de explotación en las concesiones de infraestructura vial en el Perú: relevancia, riesgos y casos críticos
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-08-27) Paz Sime, Miguel Angel
    In this article, the author examines the right to operate under road infrastructure concessions in Peru within the context of Public-Private Partnerships. He analyzes how this right, primarily exercised through toll collection, is essential to the economic equilibrium of concession projects. The author also discusses the problems that arise when the Government violates the operational rights, whether through political or legislative decisions. The author highlights the legal and contractual implications of these violations, including claims for non-compliance and compensation mechanisms, with a focus on legal certainty and investment protection.
  • listelement.badge.dso-typeÍtem,
    El control de los organismos reguladores: del régimen de barreras burocráticas a la revisión judicial
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-08-27) Gamarra Abarca, Sebastian
    Within the framework of administrative claims, the article analyzes the interactions between the resolution bodies of Indecopi (Commission for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers and the Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers) and the regulatory agencies, in order to identify the main limitations of the administrative jurisdiction, which come, among others, from the provisions of Legislative Decree 1256 and the jurisprudence of Indecopi. This situation generates control gaps that, in turn, result in the lack of protection of the citizens. To better illustrate this scenario, a historical overview of the Peruvian institutions involved is carried out, leading to a detailed review of the applicable regulations and jurisprudence. Finally, it concludes with the proposal of possible alternatives for improvement, emphasizing the revitalization of the Judicial Branch possible alternatives for improvement.
  • listelement.badge.dso-typeÍtem,
    Tutela administrativa sin ejecución: límites y desafíos en la regulación de la solución de reclamos de usuarios ante organismos reguladores en Perú
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-08-27) Barco Hidalgo, Leonardo
    The article analyzes the user complaint procedure in regulated sectors, highlighting its importance in the economy and the protection of consumer rights. It examines the dispute resolution function recognized for regulatory agencies, as well as the general regulatory framework applicable to Osiptel, Osinergmin, Sunass, and Sutran, in order to understand its legal-administrative nature. Based on this, key issues are discussed, such as the trilateral configuration of the procedure, the debate on whether concessionary companies can be considered part of the Public Administration when resolving complaints, and the limitations in provides a basis for reflecting on the regulatory and procedural challenges in ensuring effective protection of users’ rights in public services.
  • listelement.badge.dso-typeÍtem,
    El dilema de los peajes en los caminos digitales: el Fair Share o contribución justa por un uso efectivo de las redes de telecomunicaciones
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2025-08-27) Nakagawa Morales, Virginia
    In a sort of ‘chronicle of a death foretold’ the increasing intensive use of digital networks (telecommunications networks) by (i) all users, who obviously ‘pay their toll’ and (ii) those who use them but ‘do not pay their toll’ has generated a heated debate. This is because the current environment leaves no room for inefficiencies. The telecommunications industry, both nationally and internationally, is reshaping its strategies to achieve sustainability and responding to the challenge it faces with new services that are the product of new technological needs and a different competitive dynamic. You can’t hide the sun with your hands. This is a concrete reality we must face.This leads us to ask: What is going on? Are there really inefficiencies in this extraordinary mass of data traffic that has grown exponentially, saturating networks and requiring greater investments in infrastructure in the communications sector?