Debates en Sociología. Núm. 58 (2024)

URI permanente para esta colecciónhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/201844

Tabla de Contenido
  • Editorial Castro, Augusto; 5-7

    • Dossier: Alternativas y resistencias a los modelos hegemónicos capitalistas...
  • Los sindicatos rurales y el giro de Brasil a la derecha: Delgado de Carvalho, Priscila; 10-37
  • ¿Guerrilleros o campesinos? Portela García, Juan Camilo; 38-66
  • Territorializando prácticas alternativas de comercialización: Viteri, Maria Laura; Arce, Alberto; 67-92

    • #58 Varia
  • De regreso al trabajo Navarro Becerra, Ana Araceli; 93-115
  • Las cadenas como medio de vida Enrico, Nicole; 116-143
  • Transformaciones y continuidades en la gestión policial de conflictividades durante la pandemia Goldin, Deborah Judith; Rodríguez, Florencia; 144-170
  • «Pachamama no te cuido» Avalo, Ana Valeria; Duran, Valeria Vanesa; 171-206
  • Desafiando las estructuras jurídicas de despojo desde lo local Gómez Rojas, Ana Carolina; 207-235

    • Explorar

    Filtros

    20241

    Ajustes

    Temasearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.subject.Agrarian populism

    Resultados de Búsqueda

    Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
    • No hay miniatura disponible
      ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
      ¿Guerrilleros o campesinos?
      (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-06-10) Portela García, Juan Camilo
      This article addresses the processes of interpretation in the public sphere about the 2013 National Agrarian Strike in Colombia, and especially the way in which the protesters were considered authentic and legitimate. Based on a cultural sociology approach, it argues that two symbolic processes contributed to the generation of social solidarity towards the peasantry during the strike. First, the transitional context derived from the peace talks between the government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) was discursively articulated in support of the protest. Second, there was a process of symbolic coalition around the idea of the peasant as a primordial and victimized identity that gathered the support of multiple social sectors. As a result of these processes, a codification of the strike and its protagonists as legitimate and authentic was positioned in the public sphere, eclipsing the warlike and antidemocratic classification of their motivations and actions. It is proposed that this case may contribute to illuminate some relevant aspects for the positioning of agrarian populism, especially in relation to the cultural dimension.