Los poderes probatorios del juez y el modelo de proceso
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
El trabajo intenta mostrar las debilidades de las objeciones tradicionales a los poderes probatorios del juez. Para ello, se sostiene, por un lado, que la respuesta a la cuestión debe necesariamente vincularse al modelo de proceso y de juez que se pretenda implementar y, por el otro, que una respuesta adecuada al problema requiere un análisis cuidadoso de los distintos poderes probatorios y del reparto de los mismos entre el juez y las partes.
The work attempts to show the weaknesses of the traditional objections to the evidentiary powers of the judge. For this, it is argued, on the one hand, that the answer to the question must necessarily be linked to the process model and of judge that is intended to be implemented and, on the other, that an adequate response to the problem requires a careful analysis of the different evidential powers and the distribution of the same between the judge and the parties.
The work attempts to show the weaknesses of the traditional objections to the evidentiary powers of the judge. For this, it is argued, on the one hand, that the answer to the question must necessarily be linked to the process model and of judge that is intended to be implemented and, on the other, that an adequate response to the problem requires a careful analysis of the different evidential powers and the distribution of the same between the judge and the parties.
Description
Keywords
Derecho
Citation
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

