Acto, objeto y contenido: pensar la intencionalidad desde la obra de Kazimierz Twardowski
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Abstract
Tomando como punto de partida la teoría intencionalista de Brentano y su problemática distinción entre objeto intencional y objeto trascendente, el artículo presenta el modo en que Twardowski reformula dichos conceptos a partir de la diferenciación entre contenido y objeto de las representaciones: por un lado, el ‘contenido’ es el modo de darse del objeto y cumple una función intermediaria entre el acto y su correlato objetivo; por otro lado, el ‘objeto’ es el correlato trascendente necesario de todas las representaciones, aún de aquéllas cuyo objeto no existe. En este contexto, es la dimensión del juicio la que permite resolver el problema de los objetos inexistentes. La intención final del artículo es mostrar cómo Twardowski articula una teoría intencionalista del acto con una teoría del objeto y una semántica filosófica del sentido (contenido).
The article takes as a point of departure Brentano`s intentionalist theory and its problematic distinction between intentional and transcendent object, in order to present the way in which Twardowski reformulates these concepts by means of a differentiation between the content and the object of representations: on the one hand, the ‘content’ is the way of givenness of an object and fulfils an intermediary function between the act and its objective correlate; on the other hand, the ‘object’ is the necessary transcendent correlate of every representation, even of those, whose objects do not exist. In this context, it is the dimension of judgment that solves the problem of nonexistent objects. The final aim is to show how Twardowski presents an articulated theory that integrates an intentionalist theory of acts with a theory of objects and a philosophical semantics of sense (content).
The article takes as a point of departure Brentano`s intentionalist theory and its problematic distinction between intentional and transcendent object, in order to present the way in which Twardowski reformulates these concepts by means of a differentiation between the content and the object of representations: on the one hand, the ‘content’ is the way of givenness of an object and fulfils an intermediary function between the act and its objective correlate; on the other hand, the ‘object’ is the necessary transcendent correlate of every representation, even of those, whose objects do not exist. In this context, it is the dimension of judgment that solves the problem of nonexistent objects. The final aim is to show how Twardowski presents an articulated theory that integrates an intentionalist theory of acts with a theory of objects and a philosophical semantics of sense (content).
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess