The Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroa

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Adolfo Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T17:59:29Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T17:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-29
dc.description.abstractWhat does the Immanuel kant´s paradox mean for science? Why is the difference between analytic and synthetic sentences-propositions a central puzzle in science, epistemology, analytical philosophy, and philosophy of science? These inquiries entail a profound research on the foundation of philosophy and science. Despite all this necessary endeavor, this brief article focuses on the case Popper-Figueroa with the purpose to highlight the basic philosophical challenges regarding the construction of the bedrock - the substantiality of ontology- or the substratum in the scientific process.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202302.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/26702/26008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica del Perúes_ES
dc.publisher.countryPE
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2304-4306
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0254-4415
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourceEconomía; Volume 46 Issue 92 (2023)es_ES
dc.subjectRefutabilityen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectFoundationen_US
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.01
dc.titleThe Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroaen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.otherArtículo

Files

Collections

Volumen 46 Número 92 (2023)