Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución del Tribunal Fiscal No. 00518-1-2024
Cargando...
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
El presente trabajo de investigación examina la decisión tomada por medio de la
Resolución del Tribunal Fiscal No. 00518-1-2024, en la cual se aborda el
tratamiento tributario de una operación en la que una entidad no domiciliada
emitió una carta de garantía a favor de una entidad domiciliada, como
contraprestación por los pagos realizados por esta última en concepto de
comisiones por dicho servicio de garantía.
Es relevante destacar que la postura adoptada en el fallo del Tribunal Fiscal se
basa principalmente en la clasificación del concepto de "crédito indirecto". No
obstante, la presente investigación analizó el caso a partir de los conceptos de
renta de fuente capital, renta de fuente empresarial y demás instituciones
jurídicas involucradas en la materia. Asimismo, se evaluó el hecho imponible
contenido dentro de la hipótesis de incidencia contenida en el inciso c) del
artículo 9 de la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta.
A partir de este análisis, la investigación propone una respuesta jurídica en el
sistema tributario peruano, fundamentada en el tratamiento de la renta de fuente
capital, la renta de fuente empresarial, así como en los conceptos teóricojurídicos
insertos en la materia de la controversia.
This legal report examines the decision contained in Tax Court Decision No. 0518-1-2024, which addresses the tax treatment of a transaction in which a nonresident entity issued a letter of guarantee in favor of a resident entity, as consideration for payments made by the latter as commissions for such service. It is relevant to note that the position adopted in the Tax Court's ruling is mainly based on the classification of the concept of "indirect credit". However, the present investigation analyzed the case based on the concepts of capital source income, corporate source income and other legal institutions involved in the matter. Likewise, the taxable event contained in the hypothesis of incidence contained in paragraph c) of article 9 of the Income Tax Law was evaluated. Based on this analysis, the research proposes a legal response in the Peruvian tax system, based on the treatment of capital source income, corporate source income, as well as on the theoretical-legal concepts inserted in the subject matter of the controversy.
This legal report examines the decision contained in Tax Court Decision No. 0518-1-2024, which addresses the tax treatment of a transaction in which a nonresident entity issued a letter of guarantee in favor of a resident entity, as consideration for payments made by the latter as commissions for such service. It is relevant to note that the position adopted in the Tax Court's ruling is mainly based on the classification of the concept of "indirect credit". However, the present investigation analyzed the case based on the concepts of capital source income, corporate source income and other legal institutions involved in the matter. Likewise, the taxable event contained in the hypothesis of incidence contained in paragraph c) of article 9 of the Income Tax Law was evaluated. Based on this analysis, the research proposes a legal response in the Peruvian tax system, based on the treatment of capital source income, corporate source income, as well as on the theoretical-legal concepts inserted in the subject matter of the controversy.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Derecho tributario--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Impuesto a la renta--Jurisprudencia--Perú, Renta de tercera categoría--Perú
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

