Agenda Internacional

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/174837

ISSN: 1027-6750
e-ISSN: 2311-5718

Agenda Internacional es la revista académica del Instituto de Estudios Internacionales (IDEI) de la PUCP que, desde su origen en 1994, tiene como objetivo brindar un aporte multidisciplinario sobre los principales aspectos de la realidad internacional. En tal sentido, son bienvenidas contribuciones desde el mundo del derecho, la ciencia política, las relaciones internacionales, la economía, la historia y otras ramas del conocimiento siempre que brinden un aporte desde una perspectiva internacional. Desde 2005 la revista se publica con una periodicidad anual.

Explorar

Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Ítem
    Fronteras Brasil y Perú, espacio de integración y cooperación
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-11-16) Laurente, Itala; Filippi, Eduardo Ernesto
    Borders are spaces where relations between the local population and the different levels of government, whether national or subnational, are condensed. Therefore, it is relevant to create border areas of peace and sustainable development, based on regional cohesion, social integration, and territoriality, which contributes to the reduction of tensions between countries and consolidates the processes of integration and continuous cooperation. Particularly, the borders of Brazil and Peru have a strategic relevance due to their biodiversity, geographic location, presence of lakes and rivers and because it is a space for the economic development.The reason for developing this article is that Brazil and Peru have a series of border dynamics, whether territorial, social, commercial and economic. The objective of the article is to analyze the border regions between Peru and Brazil as a space with distinctive characteristics, which helps to determine possible future actions in border integration. The study is descriptive, with a qualitative approach based on documentary and quantitative review of secondary sources. It concludes that there is a need to use political, economic, social and bottom-up strategies that incorporate different multilevel actors, as well as to strengthen existing projects that allow the flow of trade and market of both Peruvian and Brazilian products across the borders, and finally, to strengthen integration and cooperation between borders to combat illegal activities and improve the development of these regions.
  • Ítem
    Los muros fronterizos. Una aproximación jurídica a la luz de los derechos humanos
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2019-10-16) Enrico Headrington, Alessandra
    The objective of this article is to analyze the complex problem of border walls. Specifically, it introduces a legal lens to the issue in order to determine whether these border walls could affect the exercise of individual human rights. With this purpose in mind, the phenomenon of border walls is examined from historical and political perspectives, concluding that since the fall of the Berlin wall and the advent of globalization, these physical barriers stand as a significant contradiction to a world that is supposedly freer and more open. It also purports to examine the general social contexts and justifications that explain why states resort to building walls on their borders. The article then addresses the constant tension between two considerations: on the one hand, the appeal to state sovereignty, and on the other, the human rights of the particular people and communities on the border lines. It emphasizes that state sovereignty must evolve in conjunction with the humanization of international law. Finally, the article discusses the two required elements to establish state responsibility in the context of border walls. For example, the commission of a wrongful act, such as the violation of the right to life or the right to physical integrity, constitutes a breach of an international obligation, which satisfies the first requirement to establish state responsibility. To fulfill the second requirement, the wrongful act must be attributed to the state, which is possible if the order for construction qualifies as a governmental act. That being said, a finding of state responsibility in this context per se is inevitably a case-specific analysis.