Agenda Internacional
URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/174837
ISSN: 1027-6750
e-ISSN: 2311-5718
Agenda Internacional es la revista académica del Instituto de Estudios Internacionales (IDEI) de la PUCP que, desde su origen en 1994, tiene como objetivo brindar un aporte multidisciplinario sobre los principales aspectos de la realidad internacional. En tal sentido, son bienvenidas contribuciones desde el mundo del derecho, la ciencia política, las relaciones internacionales, la economía, la historia y otras ramas del conocimiento siempre que brinden un aporte desde una perspectiva internacional. Desde 2005 la revista se publica con una periodicidad anual.
Explorar
5 resultados
Resultados de búsqueda
Ítem Texto completo enlazado El consentimiento estatal en el spotlight: un análisis actual de su naturaleza jurídica, su aplicación a la justicia internacional y la importancia que reviste para el derecho internacional(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2023-11-15) de Trazegnies Valdez, Carlos FernandoThis paper focuses on state consent as a central and fundamental concept within International Law. It addresses its general legal nature, its relationship with principles of International Law such as the pacta sunt servanda, consuetudo est servanda and good faith; and its classification according to the doctrine. It rigorously defines the concept and its effects in the international sphere. Likewise, the author analyses state consent from the perspective of International Procedural Law, particularly from the perspective of the International Court of Justice. In this regard, he addresses the modalities of access to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, as well as the prerogatives it has to find itself to be competent in relation to the consent of the parties. Finally, this paper proposes an analysis on the case of the Arbitral Award of 1899, between Guyana and Venezuela, based on the relativization of state consent at the hands of the International Court of Justice. It is concluded, in this regard, that the Court created a mistake by attempting to analyze whether the consent expressed by the States had been unequivocal.Ítem Texto completo enlazado La intervención de terceros Estados ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia: identificando criterios jurisprudenciales para la aceptación o denegación de las solicitudes(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2021-11-16) Roca Calderón, JosselynThere are three possible types of intervention by third States in the disputes before the International Court of Justice. Intervention for the interest of a legal nature and intervention for the construction of a convention are stipulated in the ICJ Statute, but intervention by necessity of consent of an indispensable party has been established in the jurisprudence of the aforementioned court. Within this article each type will be detailed, as well as the guidelines and/or criteria established by the ICJ itself, which have provided content to the concepts established in its provisions, either in the Statute or in its Regulations. For these purposes, their jurisprudence will be analyzed in cases with requests for intervention to identify common denominators in their pronouncements.Ítem Texto completo enlazado El asunto relativo al paso a través del Great Belt (Finlandia v. Dinamarca)(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2002) Pardo Segovia, FernandoLa presente reseña jurisprudencia! centra su atención en la solicitud de medidas provisionales formulada a la Corte Internacional de Justicia de La Haya por el gobierno de la República de Finlandia con respecto al proyecto de construcción de un puente de alto nivel desarrollado por el Reino de Dinamarca sobre el estrecho conocido como Great Be/t. Este trabajo ha sido realizado a partir de la información disponible de la Corte Internacional de Justicia.Ítem Texto completo enlazado Una reflexión sobre el diferendo argentino uruguayo por la construcción en territorio uruguayo de dos papeleras sobre el río Uruguay(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2007) Gros Espiell, HéctorComo es sabido, está a consideración de la Corte Internacional de Justicia un caso sobre la construcción de dos plantas de celulosa en territorio uruguayo sobre la mar-gen del río Uruguay. En este caso, iniciado como consecuencia de una demanda de la República Argenti-na, se han pedido, también por la Argentina, medidas conservatorias provisionales o cautelares, que el 13 de julio de 2006 han sido denegadas por la Corte, en especial, la suspensión de las obras de construcción hasta el fallo sobre el fondo que, en su momento, deberá dictar la Corte Internacional de Justicia.Ítem Texto completo enlazado La intención específica en el caso Croacia vs. Serbia: apuntes críticos sobre el fallo de la Corte Internacional de Justicia(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2016-09-23) Saucier Calderón, Jean-PaulAfter having discussed the case’s historical background and the parties’ arguments with emphasis on genocidal intent, the author offers critical comments on the ICJ’s decision. He calls into question the limitations imposed by the Court’s inferential standard and its interpretation in the Croatia v. Serbia case. Although the existence of a plurality of subjective elements in this case did not necessarily entail that there must have been a finding of genocidalintent, it appears that such a plurality has been addressed in a manner that is inconsistent with the Court’s case law, and involves excluding the possibility that genocidal intent may exist concurrently with other non-genocidal subjective elements. The Court’s position overlooks the distinction between motive and intent that has been discussed on many occasions by international criminal tribunals. That distinction could have offered a valuable framework to understand —at least partially— the interplay between different subjective elements displayed in this case. The Court’s questionable position on genocidal intent is also evidenced by its lack of a clear position on the plural reality of intent that encompasses volitional and knowledge elements. Finally, the author engages a discussion on the possibility that the Court has adopted an abstract perspective while an approach focusing on the perpetration of the alleged genocidal acts could have been more respectful of the Convention’s spirit and letter.