Informe jurídico de la Resolución N°0600-2024-SUNARPTR (NSIR-T): ¿La legislación promulgada es suficientemente exhaustiva para combatir el fraude inmobiliario?
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2024-07-30
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Resumen
En el presente informe, se analiza si la legislación establecida para combatir el
fraude inmobiliario es lo suficientemente exhaustiva para ello. Para ende, se
procederá a exponer las principales normas sobre la materia. En suma, mediante
la Resolución N°0600-2024-SUNARP-TR (NSIR-T) se explorará la aplicación de
dichas normas en sede registral, realizando un análisis de los principios
registrales vinculados y la aplicación de la norma que efetúa el Tribunal Registral.
Despúes de comprender que existe normativa vigente ¿es preciso preguntarnos
por qué aún ocurren supuestos de fraude inmobiliario por suplantación de
identidad o falsificación documentaria? Se concluye que es importante remitirse
a lo ocurrido previo extraregistralmente por lo que una efectiva validación de la
identidad de las personas por parte de notario es de suma importancia y tambíen
poner en disposción del ciudadano herramientas que lo ayuden a tener
conocimiento de que han sido de fraudados, pero no solo limitarlas a su
existencia, sino a su correcta difución e implementación.
In this report, we analyze whether the legislation established to combat real estate fraud is comprehensive enough for this purpose. To that end, we will present the main rules on the subject. In summary, through Resolution No. 0600- 2024-SUNARP-TR (NSIR-T), we will explore the application of these rules in the registry context, conducting an analysis of the related registry principles and the application of the norm carried out by the Registry Tribunal. After understanding that there is existing legislation, is it necessary to ask why cases of real estate fraud due to identity theft or document forgery still occur? It is concluded that it is important to refer to what happened prior to extraregistrally, so effective validation of individuals’ identity by a notary is of utmost importance. Additionally, providing citizens with tools to be aware of being defrauded is crucial, not only limiting them to their existence but also ensuring their proper dissemination and implementation.
In this report, we analyze whether the legislation established to combat real estate fraud is comprehensive enough for this purpose. To that end, we will present the main rules on the subject. In summary, through Resolution No. 0600- 2024-SUNARP-TR (NSIR-T), we will explore the application of these rules in the registry context, conducting an analysis of the related registry principles and the application of the norm carried out by the Registry Tribunal. After understanding that there is existing legislation, is it necessary to ask why cases of real estate fraud due to identity theft or document forgery still occur? It is concluded that it is important to refer to what happened prior to extraregistrally, so effective validation of individuals’ identity by a notary is of utmost importance. Additionally, providing citizens with tools to be aware of being defrauded is crucial, not only limiting them to their existence but also ensuring their proper dissemination and implementation.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Superintendencia Nacional de los Registros Públicos (Perú), Bienes raíces--Legislación--Perú, Fraude--Perú
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess