No sonographer, no radiologist: Assessing accuracy of artificial intelligence on breast ultrasound volume sweep imaging scans
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de Ingeniería | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marini, T.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Castañeda, B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Parker, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baran, T.M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Romero Gutierrez, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Iyer, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Y.T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hah, Z. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, M.H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brennan, G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kan, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meng, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dozier, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Connell, A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-13T16:58:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Breast ultrasound provides a first-line evaluation for breast masses, but the majority of the world lacks access to any form of diagnostic imaging. In this pilot study, we assessed the combination of artificial intelligence (Samsung S-Detect for Breast) with volume sweep imaging (VSI) ultrasound scans to evaluate the possibility of inexpensive, fully automated breast ultrasound acquisition and preliminary interpretation without an experienced sonographer or radiologist. This study was conducted using examinations from a curated data set from a previously published clinical study of breast VSI. Examinations in this data set were obtained by medical students without prior ultrasound experience who performed VSI using a portable Butterfly iQ ultrasound probe. Standard of care ultrasound exams were performed concurrently by an experienced sonographer using a high-end ultrasound machine. Expert-selected VSI images and standard of care images were input into S-Detect which output mass features and classification as “possibly benign” and “possibly malignant.” Subsequent comparison of the S-Detect VSI report was made between 1) the standard of care ultrasound report by an expert radiologist, 2) the standard of care ultrasound S-Detect report, 3) the VSI report by an expert radiologist, and 4) the pathological diagnosis. There were 115 masses analyzed by S-Detect from the curated data set. There was substantial agreement of the S-Detect interpretation of VSI among cancers, cysts, fibroadenomas, and lipomas to the expert standard of care ultrasound report (Cohen’s κ = 0.73 (0.57–0.9 95% CI), p | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Funding: This study was funded by the University of Rochester Fischer Fund. Funding was received by TM and AO. Samsung provided access to S- Detect. They provided salaries to their employees ZH and MHP. Butterfly provided access to their cloud service free of charge for the study. SR's time was supported by CONCYTEC (174-2020-FONDE-CYT-PUCP). Funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Dr. David Waldman for his invaluable assistance in initiating the study. We thank Dr. Thomas Foster and the Fischer Fund Committee at the University of Rochester for their support of the study. We thank Samsung Medison for providing our access to S-Detect software and support. We thank Averill Meadow, David Walton, Julia Benjamin, Amy Wilkinson, and Butterfly Network, Inc. for their invaluable support and assistance in facilitating our use of the iQ for this study. We thank sonographers Vicki Crist, Karri Denehy, Vanessa Micciche, and Ashley Rideout for their sonographic expertise and tireless and invaluable assistance in the study. We thank Laurie Christensen, Erica Longbine, Tammy Russell, and Nicole Underwood for their invaluable administrative and study assistance. We thank Nadezhda Kiriyak, Sarah Klingenberger, Jane Lichorowic, and Gwen Mack for their invaluable support and assistance in the figures and illustrations. We thank Lisa Bosivert, Daniel Colosi, Jannette Cong, Julie Giambrone, Susan Hobbs, Deborah Rubens, Matthew Smith, Michelle Snyder, and Courtney Strickland for their invaluable support and assistance in the study. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000148 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/205751 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:2767-3170 | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.source | PLOS Digital Health; Vol. 1, Núm. 11 November (2022) | |
| dc.subject | Sonographer | |
| dc.subject | Ultrasound | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Breast ultrasound | |
| dc.subject | Radiology | |
| dc.subject | Medical physics | |
| dc.subject | Breast imaging | |
| dc.subject | Mammography | |
| dc.subject | Breast cancer | |
| dc.subject | Internal medicine | |
| dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.00 | |
| dc.title | No sonographer, no radiologist: Assessing accuracy of artificial intelligence on breast ultrasound volume sweep imaging scans | |
| dc.type | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |
| dc.type.other | Artículo | |
| dc.type.version | https://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/version_types/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85/ |
