A simulation study to compare Shear Wave Speed estimators of the Reverberant Shear Wave Elastography approach

dc.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Laboratorio de Imágenes Médicas (LIM)
dc.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.contributor.authorRomero Gutierrez, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorRomero, A.
dc.contributor.authorBohorquez, J.
dc.contributor.authorZaharia, A.
dc.contributor.authorZavaleta, V.
dc.contributor.authorQuispe, P.
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda, B.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T16:58:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractReverberant shear wave elastography is quantitative elastography approach that involves the generation of a reverberant field that propagates in all directions within the medium. Based on the generation of the field, the information about tissues stiffness can be obtained by measuring the shear wave speed (SWS). This approach has showed encouraging results for characterization of tissues such as the experiments already carried out in vivo. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of SWS estimators for acoustic reverberant fields in heterogeneous media to achieve this purpose, three estimators were tested: Curve fitting, Phase Gradient and a Convolutional Neural Network. Parameters such as time of processing, accuracy, resolution and contrast between background and inclusion were used to determine the best estimator. The results show the inclusion zone a maximum accuracy of 94.75% can be obtained with the deep learning estimator; while, in the background, the maximum accuracy was obtained with the phase gradient estimator and was 96.85%. Even though all three estimators show good results, the execution time, lateral resolution, contrast and CNR have better results with the deep learning estimator.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: For this study, the authors acknowledge the support of CONCYTEC. In particular, Stefano Romero was under the scholarship for the doctoral program in Computer Science (174-2020-FONDECYT-PUCP).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670391
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206101
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPIE
dc.relation.conferencenameProceedings of SPIE - The InterNational Society for Optical Engineering; Vol. 12567 (2023)
dc.relation.ispartofurn:isbn:978-1-5106-6194-3
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEstimator
dc.subjectElastography
dc.subjectBeamforming
dc.subjectConvolutional neural network
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectShear (geology)
dc.subjectAcoustics
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectMathematics
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectMaterials science
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectTelecommunications
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.06.00
dc.titleA simulation study to compare Shear Wave Speed estimators of the Reverberant Shear Wave Elastography approach
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
dc.type.otherComunicación de congreso
dc.type.versionhttps://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/version_types/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85/

Files

Collections