Fragmentation of International Law: The Judicial Perspective

dc.contributor.authorTreves, Tullio
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-25T21:16:18Z
dc.date.available2017-09-25T21:16:18Z
dc.date.issued2009es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe term«fragmentation» designates the breaking up, the reduction to fragments, of something that was a whole. It implies the factual premise, that indeed, before it was fragmented, something unitary existed and the value judgment that fragmenta-tion is bad while unity is good. Debates about fragmentation of international law started without discussing the factual correctness of the unity of international law and saw fragmentation with concern, as a risk to be avoided.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/6728/6845es_ES
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editoriales_ES
dc.publisher.countryPE
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2311-5718
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1027-6750
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourceAgenda Internacional; Vol. 16, Núm. 27 (2009)es_ES
dc.subjectPolíticaes_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.09.01
dc.titleFragmentation of International Law: The Judicial Perspectivees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.otherArtículo

Archivos