Identifying factors influencing women academics in STEM careers: evidence from a Latin American country

dc.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. CENTRUM
dc.contributor.affiliationPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.contributor.authorAvolio, B.
dc.contributor.authorChávez, J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-13T16:58:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPurpose This phenomenological study, conducted within the discourse on the underrepresentation of women in academia, examined the factors influencing the advancement of women academics in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Design/methodology/approach The sample comprised twenty-one women academics from both public and private universities in Peru. Data were collected through in-depth interviews based on the women's experiences and subsequently processed using Moustakas’ (1994) stages for encoding, categorization, and analysis. Findings The study introduces a conceptual framework of nine factors – personal tastes and preferences, attitudes towards science as a vocation, care work, work–life balance, congruent gender roles, occupational segregation, lack of opportunities, low salaries, and lack of gender equality policies – that impact the career progression of women in STEM fields. Originality/value The results offer valuable insights for policymakers and academic authorities to address the barriers affecting women academics in STEM. The uniqueness of this paper lies in its investigation in Peru, a country with the highest female labor force participation in Latin America, where women constitute the majority of undergraduate program graduates.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: surveyed 53 women academics in the US who received the National Science Foundation's Advance IT grant to explore perceptions of institutional gender barriers and biases. The results showed that almost a third of participants believed women scientists' opportunities and advancement depended primarily on meritocratic processes. cautioned against attributing women's underrepresentation in STEM solely to biases, suggesting pre-university factors and field specialization likelihood also play significant roles. Given the mixed evidence, future studies in this area are needed.; Funding text 2: Funding: This work was supported by CONCYTEC/FONDECYT - Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2023-0082
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206073
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0951-354X
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Educational Management; Vol. 38, Núm. 5 (2024)
dc.subjectLatin Americans
dc.subjectCareer development
dc.subjectHigher education
dc.subjectDemographic economics
dc.subjectPolitical science
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectEconomic growth
dc.subjectPedagogy
dc.subjectSociology
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.02
dc.titleIdentifying factors influencing women academics in STEM careers: evidence from a Latin American country
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.otherArtículo
dc.type.versionhttps://vocabularies.coar-repositories.org/version_types/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85/

Files

Collections