Informe Jurídico del Expediente N° 66-2012-STC-OSINERGMIN
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2021-08-13
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Resumen
En los años 90 el Perú experimentó una de las más grandes reformas en el sector eléctrico,
pasando de un mercado bajo características de un “monopolio estatal verticalmente
integrado” a uno de “competencia mayorista”, debido a que el anterior modelo poseía
numerosas deficiencias se vio por necesario abrir camino a uno que fomente la inversión
privada y que pueda alinear los interés privados con los estatales mediante la regulación.
Es así que nace el COES como una entidad operadora del sistema encargada
principalmente de ordenar el despacho diario de energía al mínimo costo entre las
generadoras y, posteriormente, determinar y valorizar las inyecciones de potencia y
energía activa realizada al sistema.
De esta manera, en el presente informe analizaremos el Expediente N° 66-2012-STCOSINERGMIN
la cual aborda una problemática surgida en el ámbito de ejercicio de
funciones del COES como operador del sistema y OSINERGMIN como Organismo
Regulador del sector eléctrico. Por lo cual, recurrimos al análisis tanto de la normativa
aplicable durante los hechos acontecidos como de doctrina autorizada a efectos de tener
un panorama completo del caso y poder concluir que las valoraciones emitidas por el
COES son actos administrativos vinculantes a CASAPALCA y que el mecanismo para
hacer efectivo el derecho de crédito creado a favor de ELECTROPERÚ no es la vía de
solución de controversias ejercida por OSINERGMIN.
In the 90s, Peru underwent one of the largest reforms in the electricity sector, moving from a market with the characteristics of a "vertically integrated state monopoly" to one of "wholesale competition" because the previous model had numerous deficiencies. It was necessary to open the way to one that encourages private investment and can align private and state interests through regulation. Thus, the COES was born as an operating entity of the system in charge of ordering the daily dispatch of energy at minimum cost among the generators and, later, determining and valuing the injections of power and active energy made to the system. In this way, in this report, we will analyze Resolution No. 66-2012-STC-OSINERGMIN which addresses a problem that arose in the field of exercise of functions of the COES as system operator and OSINERGMIN as Regulatory Body of the electricity sector. Therefore, we resort to the analysis of both the applicable regulations during the events that occurred and the authorized doctrine to have a complete overview of the case and to be able to conclude that the assessments issued by the COES are administrative acts binding on CASAPALCA and that the mechanism for making the credit right created in favor of ELECTROPERU effective is not the means of dispute resolution exercised by OSINERGMIN.
In the 90s, Peru underwent one of the largest reforms in the electricity sector, moving from a market with the characteristics of a "vertically integrated state monopoly" to one of "wholesale competition" because the previous model had numerous deficiencies. It was necessary to open the way to one that encourages private investment and can align private and state interests through regulation. Thus, the COES was born as an operating entity of the system in charge of ordering the daily dispatch of energy at minimum cost among the generators and, later, determining and valuing the injections of power and active energy made to the system. In this way, in this report, we will analyze Resolution No. 66-2012-STC-OSINERGMIN which addresses a problem that arose in the field of exercise of functions of the COES as system operator and OSINERGMIN as Regulatory Body of the electricity sector. Therefore, we resort to the analysis of both the applicable regulations during the events that occurred and the authorized doctrine to have a complete overview of the case and to be able to conclude that the assessments issued by the COES are administrative acts binding on CASAPALCA and that the mechanism for making the credit right created in favor of ELECTROPERU effective is not the means of dispute resolution exercised by OSINERGMIN.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Perú--Legislación, Empresas eléctricas--Legislación--Perú, Organismos reguladores--Legislación--Perú
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess