Estructura sintáctica de las construcciones con verbos parasintéticos de los tipos a-…-ar y en-…-ar
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2016-01-13
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial
Abstract
Postulamos una estructura sintáctica unitaria para las construcciones con verbos parasintéticos de los tipos a-…-ar y en-…-ar mediante cuatro hipótesis: ambos esquemas verbales tienen una estructura sintáctica básica común en relación con Sv y SV, cuyos núcleos son CAUSE y BECOME, respectivamente; la diferencia entre ambos radica en que, dentro de la escala de afectación (Beavers 2011), en relación con a-…-ar, se especifica (composicionalmente) el estado resultante del tema, mientras que, en relación con en-…-ar, ello no tiene lugar. Proponemos que la afectación es un operador ubicado en una proyección externa a Sv, el cual cuantiza el evento determinando la especificidad del estado resultante para el objeto;y la forma morfológica del operador es a- o en- en caso de que su valor seapositivo o negativo respectivamente.
I postulate an unitary syntactic structure for constructions with a-…-ar and en-…-ar parasynthetic verbs through four hypothesis: both patterns have a common basic syntactic structure regarding vP and VP, whose heads are CAUSE and BECOME, respectively; the difference between the patterns lies on, within a scale of affectedness (Beavers 2011), the fact that a-…-ar assigns (compositionally) a result state to the theme, while this does not happen with en-…-ar. I claim that affectedness is a binary operator located higher than vP that quantizes the event determining the specificity of the result state for the object; and the morphological form of the operator is a- (if its value is positive) or en- (if its value is negative).
I postulate an unitary syntactic structure for constructions with a-…-ar and en-…-ar parasynthetic verbs through four hypothesis: both patterns have a common basic syntactic structure regarding vP and VP, whose heads are CAUSE and BECOME, respectively; the difference between the patterns lies on, within a scale of affectedness (Beavers 2011), the fact that a-…-ar assigns (compositionally) a result state to the theme, while this does not happen with en-…-ar. I claim that affectedness is a binary operator located higher than vP that quantizes the event determining the specificity of the result state for the object; and the morphological form of the operator is a- (if its value is positive) or en- (if its value is negative).
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess