Informe Jurídico sobre la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional recaída en el Expediente N° 00655-2010-PHC/TC
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Acceso al texto completo solo para la Comunidad PUCP
Resumen
El presente Informe Jurídico analiza la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional recaía en el
Expediente N° 00655-2010-PHC/TC, el cual resuelve el recurso de Hábeas Corpus
interpuesto por la defensa de Alberto Químper Herrera, miembro del directorio de la
empresa estatal Perúpetro, quién habría participado en negociaciones junto a Rómulo
León, ex ministro aprista, a fin de favorecer la entrega de lotes petroleros a la empresa
noruega Discover Petrolum. Dichas negociaciones se dieron a conocer debido a
interceptaciones telefónicas que sufrieron los suscritos. A pesar que, el Tribunal
Constitucional declaró improcedente la demanda, tuvo a bien pronunciarse respecto al
manejo de dichos audios provenientes de “chuponeo” por parte de la justicia, los cuales
son considerados prueba prohibida. Asimismo, el Tribunal advierte que el uso de
interceptaciones telefónicas ilícitas por parte de los medios de comunicación puede
acarrear responsabilidad penal. En ese sentido, se buscará analizar y tomar posición frente
a lo esbozado por el Tribunal Constitucional, de cara a la normativa, jurisprudencia y
doctrina jurídica respecto a la improcedencia de un Hábeas Corpus contra una resolución
judicial, la prueba prohibida y la censura previa.
This Legal Report analyzes the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in the Case No. 00655-2010-PHC/TC, which resolves the Habeas Corpus appeal filed by the defense of Alberto Químper Herrera, member of the board of directors of the state company Perúpetro, who allegedly participated in negotiations together with Rómulo León, former minister from APRA. This in order to take advantage of the delivery of oil lots to the Norwegian company Discover Petrolum. These negotiations became known due to telephone interceptions suffered by the subscribers. Despite the Constitutional Court declared the lawsuit inadmissible, it was kind enough to pronounce on the handling of such audios coming from "tapping" by the justice system, which are considered prohibited evidence. Likewise, the Court warns that the use of illicit telephone interceptions by the media may entail criminal liability. In this sense, we will to analyze and take a position on what was outlined by the Constitutional Court, in view of the regulations, jurisprudence and legal doctrine regarding the inadmissibility of a Habeas Corpus against a judicial decision, the prohibited evidence and the prior censorship.
This Legal Report analyzes the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in the Case No. 00655-2010-PHC/TC, which resolves the Habeas Corpus appeal filed by the defense of Alberto Químper Herrera, member of the board of directors of the state company Perúpetro, who allegedly participated in negotiations together with Rómulo León, former minister from APRA. This in order to take advantage of the delivery of oil lots to the Norwegian company Discover Petrolum. These negotiations became known due to telephone interceptions suffered by the subscribers. Despite the Constitutional Court declared the lawsuit inadmissible, it was kind enough to pronounce on the handling of such audios coming from "tapping" by the justice system, which are considered prohibited evidence. Likewise, the Court warns that the use of illicit telephone interceptions by the media may entail criminal liability. In this sense, we will to analyze and take a position on what was outlined by the Constitutional Court, in view of the regulations, jurisprudence and legal doctrine regarding the inadmissibility of a Habeas Corpus against a judicial decision, the prohibited evidence and the prior censorship.