Estudios de Filosofía

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/175808

e-ISSN: 2409-1596

Estudios de Filosofía es una revista de periodicidad anual, editada por el Seminario de Filosofía del Instituto Riva-Agüero, escuela de altos estudios humanísticos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, y elaborada con el esfuerzo conjunto de profesores y estudiantes de Filosofía de esta universidad. Se publica por primera vez en 1975; a partir de 2009, la revista se publica de forma exclusivamente electrónica.

Su objetivo es difundir textos originales e inéditos, principalmente -aunque no de modo exclusivo- de quienes se inician en la investigación. Se incluyen artículos, traducciones, estudios críticos, reseñas, entrevistas, notas bibliográficas y noticias de actividades filosóficas diversas.

Todos los artículos presentados a la revista son sometidos a un proceso de arbitraje doble ciego realizado por pares nacionales.

Explorar

Filtros

2015 - 20162

Ajustes

Temasearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.subject.Pensamiento

Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    De la imagen-transparente a la imagen-opaca. Hacia una taxonomía de la imagen fotográfica a partir de la filosofía de Gilles Deleuze
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2016-12-01) León, Alejandro
    Deleuze’s work is certainly heterogeneous. Throughout his life he managedto deal with an amazing variety of subjects: history of philosophy, psychoanalysis, politics, literature, painting, cinema, among others. However, the author of A Thousand Plateaus did not address a particularly relevant area for the twentieth century configuration –photography. This absence is unsettling not only because of the cultural importance of photography, but also because his reflections concerning the concept of image are a recurrent theme throughout his work. This research will not seek to determine the reasons why Deleuze did not explore the field of photography, because we believe that a question like this is, to say the least, idle. On the contrary, we will try to prolong his reflections in order to unfold the intuitions found in his philosophy that may help us to address the issue of the photographic. In this sense, our objective will be to develop a taxonomy of the photographic image from the distinction of two main types: the transparent image and the opaque image.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    Genitalidad e (im)potencia del pensamiento: Heidegger, Deleuze, Agamben
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2015-12-01) Pimentel, Sebastián
    This paper reports how according to Heidegger, Deleuze, and Agamben, both the notion of thinking and of philosophical activity, far from meaning the same, involve fundamental differences. However, our reading of the three authors also proposes to discover a common affiliation related to the contrast between “doxa” and “thinking”; Heidegger’s, Deleuze’s and Agamben’s are three ways by which we can understand the “birth” or “emergence” of thinking as an experience or activity that should not be understood as stemming from the field of communication or re-presentation. All these considerations converge finally in the subtle quality of thought as liminal “pow-er” that, according to each author, must also be understood in its paradoxical quality of “impotence”, quality much closer to the experience of in-corporation as an event (Heidegger); to the pre-supposed, non-discursive moment –and simultaneously con- stituent– of either philosophical, artistic, or scientific “creation” (Deleuze); or to the pure enjoyment of power, as the experience of a type of “deprivation”, both positive and unlimited, as well as eluding any “function” (Agamben).