Estudios de Filosofía

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/175808

e-ISSN: 2409-1596

Estudios de Filosofía es una revista de periodicidad anual, editada por el Seminario de Filosofía del Instituto Riva-Agüero, escuela de altos estudios humanísticos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, y elaborada con el esfuerzo conjunto de profesores y estudiantes de Filosofía de esta universidad. Se publica por primera vez en 1975; a partir de 2009, la revista se publica de forma exclusivamente electrónica.

Su objetivo es difundir textos originales e inéditos, principalmente -aunque no de modo exclusivo- de quienes se inician en la investigación. Se incluyen artículos, traducciones, estudios críticos, reseñas, entrevistas, notas bibliográficas y noticias de actividades filosóficas diversas.

Todos los artículos presentados a la revista son sometidos a un proceso de arbitraje doble ciego realizado por pares nacionales.

Explorar

Filtros

2017 - 20192

Ajustes

Autorsearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.author.Pomposini, Antonio

Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    Entre lo orgánico y lo inorgánico: la experiencia del hacerse cosa en Perniola y Braidotti
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2019-12-13) Pomposini, Antonio
    The objective of this article is to explore the work of two contemporary authors: Mario Perniola and Rosi Braidotti. They both defend an immanent materialism in which they find that there can be no radical distinction between human beings and the matter that surrounds them. An appeal to transcendental reason is no longer possible for them if one wants to understand and describe contemporary society. Each author explains, from their viewpoint, how the notion of subjectivity has been transformed, what the importance of difference is and what the role of sensibility should be, exploring, thusly, the ways in which the human interacts and melds with the world of the inorganic in this posthuman context. This article presents the positions of both authors in order to explore the extent to which possible connections and agreements can be drawn, as well as their key differences.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    ¿Qué posibilidad de discusión y acuerdo hay para Kant respecto de diversos juicios de gusto?
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2017-11-30) Pomposini, Antonio
    This paper examines the importance that judgements of taste have within Kant’s Critique of Judgement. It claims that looking for de facto agreements about judgements of taste is a mistake and that disagreements, instead, are desirable. Following Kant in the antinomy of taste, judgments of taste are not based on determined concepts, but rather on an undetermined one. Since the concept is not determined one cannot exhibit it in a sensible intuition or make direct reference to it. It is argued that universal agreement does not seek de facto agreement, but rather the discovery of a common sense in which one discovers that others can feel the same as one does with respect to a given representation. This undetermined concept becomes a “regulative ideal”, unobtainable in so far as one cannot determine it, but to which one must aim in order to perfect one’s taste. It is in the sphere of discussion and disagreement that one confronts one’s judgements of taste.