Histórica
URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/175373
ISSN: 0252-8894
e-ISSN: 2223-375X
Fundada en 1977, Histórica es la revista semestral de la sección de Historia del Departamento de Humanidades de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Publica trabajos de investigación, originales e inéditos, escritos en español, sobre la historia del Perú, la historia latinoamericana, de interés para el Perú y de teoría de la historia. Comprende tres secciones: artículos, notas y reseñas de libros.
Explorar
5 resultados
Resultados de búsqueda
Ítem Texto completo enlazado Jaime Edmundo Rodríguez Ordóñez (1940-2022)(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-10-03) Peralta Ruiz, VíctorJaime Edmundo Rodríguez Ordóñez was, beyond doubt, one of Latin America’s most outstanding historians. This note provides a biographical portrait and describes his key contribution to the understanding of South American independence. Jaime Rodríguez’s production was wide-ranging and always in dialogue with Latin American and European historiography.Ítem Texto completo enlazado Alberto Flores Galindo y su interpretación de la independencia peruana(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2020-12-21) Peralta Ruiz, VíctorThis paper focuses on the study of the three interpretative paths that historian Alberto Flores Galindo developed in his analysis of Peruvian independence. It is argued that the double sensibility, academic and political, of this historian surfaced in his approach to issues such as the revolution of Tupac Amaru II, the Creole complicity in sustaining a counterrevolution of independence marked by social discrimination and the destruction of the project of an aristocratic and popular Andean utopia. Throughout this analysis, it is shown that the methodological trajectory of this historian was marked by the academic debates raised by the commemoration of the sesquicentennial of independence but also by the acute crisis experienced by the country in its process of democratic transition that led him to design and defend a leftist revolutionary option. Finally, it will be discussed to what extent the current historiographical knowledge on the emancipatory conjuncture reviews his interpretative essays.Ítem Texto completo enlazado Guerra internacional, revolución y dictadura: los partidos parlamentarios y la política peruana entre 1865 y 1867(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2018) Peralta Ruiz, VíctorThis article studies the political behavior of the first Peruvian parliamentary parties between the constitutional government of General Juan Antonio Pezet and the Dictatorship of General Mariano Ignacio Prado. I argue that the revolutionary option in 1865 and 1867 was conditioned by the way the government conducted its diplomatic conflict with Spain, in the first case, and by how the dictatorship made use of the political gains of the naval conflict of May 2 1866, in the second. That is to say, unlike other countries involved in the Spanish diplomatic question, international war conditioned the Peruvian political system. In particular, international war becomes an explanatory factor for the main parliamentary parties’ coup intentions, having felt circumstantially excluded by the executive office.Ítem Texto completo enlazado Vargas Ezquerra, Juan Ignacio. Un hombre contra un continente. José Abascal, rey de América (1806-1816). Prólogo de Antonio R. Peña Izquierdo. León: Akrón Historia, 2010, 282 pp.(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2010-03-24) Peralta Ruiz, VíctorNo presenta resumenÍtem Texto completo enlazado La revolución de la independencia del Perú (1860) de Benjamín Vicuña Mackenna en la historiografía peruana(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2013-12-17) Peralta Ruiz, VíctorThis article will center on the impact of the work La revolución de la independencia del Perú (Lima, 1860) by the Chilean historian Benjamín Vicuña Mackenna (Santiago, 1831-1886). It will discuss the novelty of the use of the term «revolution» in an age in which Peruvian historiography rejected the political use of that term. It will then discuss the reception of Vicuña’s work in Peruvian historiography in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In particular, it underlines the reasons why this work was not included as a supporting text in the formation of the nationalist discourse of the Peruvian state.