Derecho PUCP. Núm. 89 (2022)

URI permanente para esta colecciónhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/193371

Tabla de Contenido

Sección Principal

Tráfico de migrantes en las fronteras del norte de Chile: irregularización migratoria y sus resistencias Liberona Concha, Nanette; Romero Quezada, Mileska; Salinas, Sius-geng; Veloso, Karen; 9-36

Política migratoria en las islas Canarias: violaciones de derechos humanos durante la pandemia Rodríguez Salinas, Roberto; 37-75

Mujeres latinoamericanas inmigrantes en España: experiencias de racismo y asimilación Hernández Martínez, Camila; Vilanova Becker, Patricia; 77-112

Limitación en Chile de la emigración de las madres custodias junto a sus hijos y/o hijas: ¿una exigencia del principio del interés superior? Mondaca, Alexis Alberto; 113-139

Notas sociojurídicas sobre el alcance del voto migrante en la ciudad de Buenos Aires Penchaszadeh, Ana Paula; Arlettaz, Fernando; 141-175

Estrasburgo y la detención de inmigrantes: ¿nueva línea jurisprudencial? Claro Quintáns, Irene; 177-203

La impugnación administrativa en la nueva ley migratoria chilena Harris Moya, Pedro; 205-228

Contradicciones de la política migratoria chilena (2018-2022) Cociña-Cholaky, Martina; 229-260

Politizar la violencia: migración, violencia sexo-genérica y cuidados comunitarios Stang, María Fernanda; Stefoni, Carolina; 261-288

Miscelánea

Ruptura entre promesas, voluntad y autonomía: ¿qué justifica la fuerza obligatoria del contrato? Pereira Fredes, Esteban Antonio; 291-323

Autoría mediata por aparatos organizados de poder y coautoría en el ámbito empresarial: ¿solución frente a las limitaciones del derecho chileno para castigar como autores a los órganos directivos de las empresas? Contreras Chaimovich, Lautaro Camilo; Castro Morales, Álvaro; 325-364

Explorar

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Texto completo enlazado
Contradicciones de la política migratoria chilena (2018-2022)
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-11-24) Cociña-Cholaky, Martina
Under the slogan of “putting the house in order”, the government of Sebastián Piñera, since his presidential inauguration in 2018, has imposed various requirements on human mobility, which have hindered the entry and regular stay of groups such as Haitians and Venezuelans. These measures have been accompanied by a commitment to the militarization of the northern border and the mediatization of expulsions, along with a rhetoric that dichotomizes displacements into positive/negative, according to their administrative situation, thus conditioning the rights of migrants. This paper examines, from the paradigm of migration governance and through a documentary analysis, the Chilean migration policy from 2018 to 2022, investigating from a qualitative and exploratory approach the main measures implemented and the rhetoric used. It is concluded that in this presidential period a policy has been intensified that, through a human rights narrative, restricts certain flows, increasing irregularity and the precariousness of the crossings, consequences that contradict the premise of “orderly, safe and regular migration” on which the government administration is based. This dynamic has been strongly expressed in the Tarapacá Region, a territory that has become the epicenter of the migratory situation.
Texto completo enlazado
Politizar la violencia: migración, violencia sexo-genérica y cuidados comunitarios
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-11-24) Stang, María Fernanda; Stefoni, Carolina
This article deals with gender-sex violence as a significant expression of the structural nature of gender and sexuality in migratory processes. From the biographical approach, expressions of the multiple forms that this violence acquires (direct, structural, cultural) are addressed in the narratives of ten cis and trans migrant women of Latin American origin who reside in the cities of Antofagasta and Santiago, located in the north and central Chile, respectively, and who have an active participation in social organizations that carry out community care tasks, although these labours are not part of the purposes and main actions of these organizations. The approach is carried out around the idea of politicization in two senses: first, from the proposal to politicize sex-gender violence that is, to make visible the power relations that make it possible and the historical processes that have led to the construction of “violent” bodies and lives from the framework that intersects gender and sexuality with foreignness, ethnicity, “race” and class, among other dimensions; and, second, from the analysis of experiences of politicization of some of these migrant women in which this sex-gender violence is re-signified as the engine of their social participation, a re-signification crossed by the tensions and contradictions that this channeling of participatory action in tasks characterized by sex-gender inequality such as care implies. Although it is concluded that the scope of these experiences in the transformation of this sex-gender violence is fundamentally limited to the individual scale of intradomestic violence, it is proposed that these organizational experiences, in their daily actions and practices, silently and in the long run term undermine the liminality of the foreigner in relation to the recognition of rights by the State of residence, which harbors transformative potentialities of the idea of citizenship, at least from that practical dimension.