Explorar

Resultados de Búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
  • Ítem
    Verdad y libertad en Kierkegaard
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2014-12-03) Caravedo, Joan
    This paper proposes an introduction to the Kierkegaardian relation between freedom and truth. In order to do this, mainly paying attention to his Philosophical Fragments, it begins with the Socratic problem of acquiring truth. After this, it focuses on truth as the fruit of God’s free love, whence emerges the topic of freedom. Finally, this theme leads to the Kierkegaardian account of becoming, and specifically to the relation between possibility and reality. Throughout this exposition, the central concept that articulates this itinerary is the “instant”, understanding it as the point of convergence between the eternal and the temporal, stressing the paradox therein.
  • Ítem
    Verdad y subjetividad en el Postscriptum de S. Kierkegaard
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2014-12-03) Zelada, Manuel
    The following commentary offers an analysis of subjective truth in Soren Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript to his Philosophical Fragments. Our intention is to discuss Kierkegaard’s reflections on subjective truth, in order to show that, rather than claiming that the subject’s interiority defines truth (subjectivism), Kierkegaard thought that truth supposes more than the subject itself.
  • Ítem
    Los pseudónimos de una excepción o filosofar después de Kierkegaard según Paul Ricoeur
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2014-12-03) Ascárate, Luz
    Paul Ricoeur, known as a reader of paradoxes, interprets Kierkegaard's philosophy “paradoxically” in two ways. This exception represents the paradoxical relationship of all philosophical work with the particular existence that is the philosopher, existence that must be understood as the non-philosophical source of every philosophy. The second one refers to the inside of his philosophy. In this sense, his conceptual developments represent the incompleteness of the philosophical system when it has to deal with the issue of evil: an unsolvable enigma that is thematized at the center of existence as anguish and despair. From this point of view, we formulate the question: “how can we understand the philosophical work after Kierkegaard?” and our answer claims that this meaning goes beyond philosophy itself. It consists in starting at the existence that nourishes philosophy, and enables the never-ending treatment of philosophical procedure.
  • Ítem
    La experiencia de la libertad: un salto de fe
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2014-12-03) Valdez, Martín
    This paper seeks to interpret Fear and Trembling’s paradox of faith together with Kant’s examination of the problem of freedom, in order to reconcile Kierkegaard’s thought with rationalism, but at the same time, to enrich the latter with a more existential language. It argues that, at the ground of all ethics, a certain experience beyond the limits of reason is found, albeit not an irrational one.