Bullying y migración venezolana: estudio mixto CUAN-cual en colegios estatales de Lima Metropolitana
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2023-08-28
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Resumen
El presente estudio explora las diferencias en el riesgo de ser víctima de buylling entre
estudiantes migrantes venezolanos con desplazamiento forzado y colegios estatales.
empleó un diseño mixto CUAN-cual con estatus dominante y secuencial (Hernández,
2010). Participaron un total de 246 escolares de secundaria entre 12 a 17 años (M=14.73,
DE=1.41), 123 peruanos y 123 venezolanos. Se empleó la Escala de Agresión y
Victimización (Kilimajer, 2018), un cuestionario para los datos sociodemográfico y la
experiencia con la migración, y un Diario de Campo. Los resultados muestran las
dificultades del instrumento para discriminar el riesgo de ser víctimas de bullying con
condición de desplazamiento forzado. A nivel cualitativo se encontró que ambos grupos
naturalizan el empleo de la violencia, identificándose diferencias en la manera de
legitimar el uso de la violencia. Se concluye que las pruebas diseñadas para el presente
estudio no son sensibles en detectarlas en situaciones de discriminación y se deben
priorizar diseños CUALl-cuan para el estudio de este tipo de fenómeno.
The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of the risk of being victims of bullying between Venezuelan students who had suffered forced displacement and Peruvian students from public high schools. For this, a QUANTITIVE-qualitative mixed method with dominant and sequential status was used (Hernandez, 2010). 246 high school students between 12 and 17 years participated (M=14.73, SD=1.41), 123 peruvians and 123 venezuelans. The Aggression and Victimization Scale (Kilimajer, 2018), a sociodemographic questionnarie and a Field Diary were used. As a result, no quantitive differences were found in the risk of being victims of bullying with the condition of forced displacement. It is concluded that the test designed for this study was not sensitive in detecting situations of discrimination and qualitative-quantitive designs should be prioritized for greater accuracy.
The aim of this study was to analyze the differences of the risk of being victims of bullying between Venezuelan students who had suffered forced displacement and Peruvian students from public high schools. For this, a QUANTITIVE-qualitative mixed method with dominant and sequential status was used (Hernandez, 2010). 246 high school students between 12 and 17 years participated (M=14.73, SD=1.41), 123 peruvians and 123 venezuelans. The Aggression and Victimization Scale (Kilimajer, 2018), a sociodemographic questionnarie and a Field Diary were used. As a result, no quantitive differences were found in the risk of being victims of bullying with the condition of forced displacement. It is concluded that the test designed for this study was not sensitive in detecting situations of discrimination and qualitative-quantitive designs should be prioritized for greater accuracy.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Acoso escolar, Violencia en la escuela, Venezolanos en Perú, Escolares--Perú--Lima
Citación
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess