Heterodoxia, neoliberalismo y el “Consenso de Washington”. Un análisis comparativo: Argentina-Perú 1985-2010
Files
Date
2010
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Departamento de Economía
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es discutir acerca de la cierta terminología utilizada en forma errónea en los discursos políticos latinoamericanos; los dos países fueron elegidos como muestra para la discusión. De tal manera que los indicadores cuantitativos constituyen argumentos para la discusión sobre temas políticos, sociales e institucionales. Las conclusiones sugieren que la gestión política es más importante que los modelos económicos.
This paper aim to discuss about a common terminology misused in Latin American political speech, associated with the models of political economy; the two countries were selected as samples for discussion. In such a way, the quantitative indicators showed are arguments for political, social and institutional discussion in a short history period. The conclusions suggest that political management is more important than economical models.
This paper aim to discuss about a common terminology misused in Latin American political speech, associated with the models of political economy; the two countries were selected as samples for discussion. In such a way, the quantitative indicators showed are arguments for political, social and institutional discussion in a short history period. The conclusions suggest that political management is more important than economical models.
Description
Keywords
Neoliberalismo (Economía)--Perú
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess