Controversia en la Revisión Tarifaria en el Terminal Muelle Sur del Terminal Portuario del Callao 2015- 2020: la Inversión Complementaria Adicional
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract
El autor plantea las posiciones del OSITRAN y DPW frente a la controversia generada por el reconocimiento de la Inversión Complementaria Adicional (ICA) dentro de la revisión tarifaria efectuada por el regulador. Debido a que el ICA fue el mecanismo de desempate de la subasta por obtener la concesión de la Zona Sur del Puerto del Callao, se analizan los fundamentos económicos del mecanismo de licitación y del método de regulación tarifaria de este proyecto.
The author outlines the positions of DPW and OSITRAN against the controversy over the recognition of the Additional Complementary Investment (ICA) within the tariff review by the regulator. Because the ICA was the mechanism playoff auction to obtain the grant of the South Zone of the Port of Callao, the economic fundamentals of bidding mechanism and method of tariff regulation of this project are analyzed.
The author outlines the positions of DPW and OSITRAN against the controversy over the recognition of the Additional Complementary Investment (ICA) within the tariff review by the regulator. Because the ICA was the mechanism playoff auction to obtain the grant of the South Zone of the Port of Callao, the economic fundamentals of bidding mechanism and method of tariff regulation of this project are analyzed.
Description
Keywords
Concessions Contract, Regulatory Tariffs, Biddings, Regulación Tarifaria, Mecanismo de Licitación, Contratos de Concesión
Citation
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess