Contabilidad y Negocios

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/175874

ISSN: 1992-1896
e-ISSN: 2221-724X

Contabilidad y Negocios es una revista científica comprometida con el desarrollo y difusión de conocimientos científicos que busca consolidarse como un referente global en las áreas relacionadas a las líneas de investigación promovidas por el Departamento Académico de Ciencias Contables de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú: Administración, Actualidad Contable, Contabilidad de Gestión, Auditoría, Banca y Finanzas y Ética en los negocios.

Contabilidad y Negocios asume el compromiso autoimpuesto de promover la paridad de género entre los miembros del Comité Científico Internacional, así como en los autores que publican en nuestra revista. Compromiso que se verá cumplido a partir del primer número del 2025.

Contabilidad y Negocios se encuentra indizada en Web of Science (WoS) - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) Q4, Dialnet, BASE, CLASE, DOAJ, EBSCO Host, Journal TOCs, Latindex, ProQuest, Redalyc, Primo Central, QUALIS (Clasificación A4) y MIAR (ICDS 9.7).

Explorar

Filtros

2022 - 20242

Ajustes

Fecha de inicio: 2022Temasearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.subject.Accounting education

Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    Tratamiento del desarrollo sostenible en la formación de contadores en Brasil
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-05-02) Vazquez Carrazana, Xiomara Esther; Miranda, Gilberto José
    The attempt of identifying the curricula content of accounting courses in Brazil for studies on sustainable development became the research problem, thus posing the objective to identify the significant nature of core themes on sustainable development in curricula of accounting programs in Brazil. Prior studies revealed a fragmented treatment of sustainable development in accounting science curriculum in the country (Mannes et al., 2018; Rocha et al., 2021; Santos et al., 2021), which evidences by local and global consensus that accountants in training must develop social responsibility as a result of the interconnection of several curriculum components (Alves Cosenza, 2019; Gomes et al., 2012; Gray Collison, 2002; Montilla et al., 2013; Santos et al., 2021). This article supports the interconnection of four core themes: ethics, philosophy, socioenvironmental reports, and human rights. This is an exploratory and documentary research, and the object of study involves 30 curricula of undergraduate Accounting courses offered by Brazilian universities with undergraduate and stricto sensu post-graduate programs. In these curricula compulsory subjects that could cover sustainable development during academic year 2021 were revised. In a general overview, no integral or multidimensional content on sustainability was observed in the curricula, which highlights better results in some other regions of the country.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    Diferencias en el rendimiento académico a través del aprendizaje individual y cooperativo según los estilos de aprendizaje: un experimento en un curso de Ciencias Contables
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-06-27) Quoos, Anderson Rodrigo; Benkendorf, Eda Cristina; dos Santos, Cleston Alexandre; Walter, Silvana Anita
    The present study is distinguished by including the theoretical lens of cooperative learning, to minimize possible differences in performance between the learning styles of students in the Bachelor’s degree in Accounting. The objective was to verify differences in academic performance, through Individual and Cooperative Learning, according to Learning Styles, in an Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, through an experiment. Regarding the methodology, this study is classified as an experimental research, which was used to identify learning styles, the model proposed by Felder-Silverman. Statistical tests, t test, analysis of post-experiments questionnaires, normality test, ANOVA and homogeneity of variance test were used. As a result, Hypothesis 1 was confirmed, in which a significant difference in performance was identified, between individual and cooperative learning, but Hypothesis 2 and 3 were rejected, which investigated differences in performance, between learning styles, and, the difference in performance between individual learning and cooperative learning. From the post-experiment, it was identified that individuals were uncomfortable with the activity, mainly because the choice of groups was random, which may have influenced the final performance.