Derecho PUCP

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/179977

ISSN: 0251-3420
e-ISSN: 2305-2546

La revista Derecho PUCP, fundada en 1944, publica artículos de investigación jurídica o interdisciplinaria inéditos y originales, los cuales son revisados por pares externos que han publicado investigaciones similares previamente. Las evaluaciones se realizan de forma anónima (sistema doble ciego) y versan sobre la calidad y validez de los argumentos expresados en los artículos. Cuenta con tres secciones: (i) Sección Principal, (ii) Miscelánea e (iii) Interdisciplinaria.

La periodicidad de Derecho PUCP es semestral, apareciendo, tanto en su soporte físico como en su versión digital, en el primer día del periodo de publicación. El primer número de la revista abarca el periodo de junio a noviembre, y el segundo, de diciembre a mayo.

La revista está incluida en los siguientes índices, base de datos, directorios y catálogos: Scopus, Redalyc, SciELO Perú, Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science), Erih Plus, Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (IFLP), Dialnet, Worldcat, Hein Online, Primo Central, Latindex, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), JournalTOCS, BASE, CLASE, EbscoHost, Cengage Learning, Vlex, REBUIN, La Referencia y ALICIA (Concytec).

Explorar

Temasearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.subject.Derecho procesal

Resultados de búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    Litigantes propensos al riesgo: manifestaciones de su participación en el proceso civil
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-05-29) Carrasco Delgado, Nicolás
    This article develops a theoretical framework on the propensity for risk applied to litigation. From this theoretical framework, it follows that the risk prone will initiate legal proceedings more than those averse to it; that when the risk prone are sued, their propensity to risk does not decrease in the face of low variability chance of loss in comparison with previous chances of loss of greater variability; and that furthermore, they generate greater legal expenses than people of other risk profiles. The aforementioned causes greater social losses on increasing the negative externalities of litigation due to the greater divergence between its private and social benefits. The latter shall be examined regarding the issues of permanent courts and the possibility of reaching agreements.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    La constitucionalización del derecho peruano
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2013-11-21) Landa Arroyo, César
    Constitutionalizaton of Law’s different areas is a phenomenon gradually more ingrained in our cultural and legal framework. Maybe the best demonstration is the increasingly prominent role of the Constitutional Court (TC) – Constitution’s Supreme Interpreter – in defining and redefining concepts, rights and legal principles touching a range of subjects, from TaxLaw to Human Rights. This is relevant to understand the Law and its current effects whether it is valued positively or negatively.
  • No hay miniatura disponible
    ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
    La regla de oferta final en el panel eléctrico chileno
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2018-11-28) Carrasco Delgado, Nicolás Ignacio Ariel
    Efficient solutions are difficult to adopt, as they comprehend a large amount of information and require identifying an optimum point, which weighs up the benefits and costs involved. One means of simplifying this task arises with the final offer rule (the judge accepts the position of one or the other part, in a complete way). The Chilean electricity system provides for a rule of this nature to rule on disputes, which come before the so-called «electrical panel». This article will discuss the rule’s considerations of efficiency and the complexities, which the final offer presents for traditional procedural principles. A rule acclaimed by economists for taking decisions could cause lawyers to reconsider the mechanisms for resolving certain disputes.