Derecho PUCP. Núm. 92 (2024)

URI permanente para esta colecciónhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/199883

Tabla de Contenido
Sección Principal
  • Calistenia constitucional: una futura integración del Acuerdo de Escazú con el derecho constitucional peruano Gamboa Balbín, César; 9-54
  • La protección penal internacional del medio ambiente: hacia el delito de ecocidio Martín Aragón, María del Mar; 55-94
  • Ordenamiento territorial y concesiones mineras en el Perú: bases para un sistema integrado y armónico con el desarrollo sostenible Chinchay Tuesta, Ady; Scurrah, Martin; 95-137
  • El consumo sustentable: un principio implícito en el sistema chileno de consumo Isler Soto, Erika; 139-168

    • Miscelánea
  • Implicancias jurídicas del modelo social de discapacidad en la imputabilidad penal Torres Flor, Analucía; Bedoya Perales, Percy Vladimiro; 171-208
  • ¿Qué es convivir en pareja? Los supuestos espaciales de la Corte Suprema colombiana en casos de pensión de sobrevivientes Rodríguez Morales, Andrés; 209-232
  • Discusiones en torno a la presunción de la inocencia en el ámbito jurídico angloamericano Díaz, Ernesto Matías; 233-267
  • Autores y partícipes: un estudio comparado entre el Código Penal alemán y el Código Penal Modelo de los Estados Unidos Cordini, Nicolás Santiago; 269-299

    • Interdisciplinaria
  • Cuando la comunidad «dice» el derecho: las asambleas de justicia indígena en Oaxaca Vázquez Hernández, Irán; 301-327
  • Litigantes propensos al riesgo: manifestaciones de su participación en el proceso civil Carrasco Delgado, Nicolás; 329-360
  • Respuestas adaptativas, derecho a la salud y el límite del criterio de satisfacción: una reflexión y puesta en evidencia desde el sistema de salud peruano Cornejo Amoretti, Leandro; 361-393

    • Explorar

    Filtros

    20241

    Ajustes

    Autorsearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.author.Bedoya Perales, Percy VladimiroTemasearch.filters.applied.operator.equals: search.filters.subject.Culpabilidad

    Resultados de Búsqueda

    Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
    • No hay miniatura disponible
      ÍtemTexto completo enlazado
      Implicancias jurídicas del modelo social de discapacidad en la imputabilidad penal
      (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-05-29) Torres Flor, Analucía; Bedoya Perales, Percy Vladimiro
      The entry into force of Legislative Decree No. 1384 meant that Peru incorporated into its legislation on legal capacity the paradigm of the Social Model of Disability contained in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006). This has meant a resounding change in the understanding of the notion of capacity and the existing interaction between the legal system and any person who presents psychosocial, intellectual and/or cognitive deficiencies, since now what was initially an impediment to the exercise of their rights and obligations is no longer an impediment and it is assumed that every person enjoys full legal capacity to deploy their legal sphere. Now, considering that the Law is presented as a normative system that responds to criteria of logic and internal coherence and that its considerations are based on a common factor such as the person and his behavior, the following question arises: what are the implications that this change causes in the legal treatment of the capacity to be subject to criminal charges? From this perspective, we analyze how this new conception of capacity would operate in the field of criminal law, mainly that referring to the notions of imputability and culpability. This responds to the fact that these categories are also structured on the notion of capacity as aptitude to be motivated in accordance with the norm or to infringe it and, thus, be considered responsible for the typical wrongdoing and deserving of punishment. In this line, we consider that the Social Model of Disability would imply that the bases of the sanction in the criminal field, contained in the mentioned categories, are also reformulated, since the notion of capacity is a unanimous element to the legal reasoning that is based on the logic of the duty that every person has to adapt his conduct to the Law, which cannot be considered in an abstract way by the legal system, as the legislation inspired by the mentioned model would do.