(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-11-24) Stang, María Fernanda; Stefoni, Carolina
This article deals with gender-sex violence as a significant expression of the structural nature of gender and sexuality in migratory processes. From the biographical approach, expressions of the multiple forms that this violence acquires (direct, structural, cultural) are addressed in the narratives of ten cis and trans migrant women of Latin American origin who reside in the cities of Antofagasta and Santiago, located in the north and central Chile, respectively, and who have an active participation in social organizations that carry out community care tasks, although these labours are not part of the purposes and main actions of these organizations. The approach is carried out around the idea of politicization in two senses: first, from the proposal to politicize sex-gender violence that is, to make visible the power relations that make it possible and the historical processes that have led to the construction of “violent” bodies and lives from the framework that intersects gender and sexuality with foreignness, ethnicity, “race” and class, among other dimensions; and, second, from the analysis of experiences of politicization of some of these migrant women in which this sex-gender violence is re-signified as the engine of their social participation, a re-signification crossed by the tensions and contradictions that this channeling of participatory action in tasks characterized by sex-gender inequality such as care implies. Although it is concluded that the scope of these experiences in the transformation of this sex-gender violence is fundamentally limited to the individual scale of intradomestic violence, it is proposed that these organizational experiences, in their daily actions and practices, silently and in the long run term undermine the liminality of the foreigner in relation to the recognition of rights by the State of residence, which harbors transformative potentialities of the idea of citizenship, at least from that practical dimension.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-11-24) Harris Moya, Pedro
The entry into force of the Law No. 21325 in Chile in 2021 has not only reformed judicial review in matters of migration and foreigners, it has also introduced significant modifications to administrative appeal, under the application of basic administrative laws. Apparently, this law has increased the effectiveness of such claims if they are exercised against nonexpulsive acts (having established their compatibility with other appeals and, likewise, the suspension of the effects of the contested acts) and excluded the application of administrative appeals against an expulsion measure. However, this first interpretation can admit other interpretations. The administrative appeal against non-expulsive acts may impose restrictions on the rights of the claimant, in line with certain interpretative criteria developed by the case law in Chile. Likewise, the ineffectiveness of such claims against expulsive acts may be corrected, in accordance with the constitutional guarantees regarding the exercise of these mechanisms.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2022-11-24) Cociña-Cholaky, Martina
Under the slogan of “putting the house in order”, the government of Sebastián Piñera, since his presidential inauguration in 2018, has imposed various requirements on human mobility, which have hindered the entry and regular stay of groups such as Haitians and Venezuelans. These measures have been accompanied by a commitment to the militarization of the northern border and the mediatization of expulsions, along with a rhetoric that dichotomizes displacements into positive/negative, according to their administrative situation, thus conditioning the rights of migrants. This paper examines, from the paradigm of migration governance and through a documentary analysis, the Chilean migration policy from 2018 to 2022, investigating from a qualitative and exploratory approach the main measures implemented and the rhetoric used. It is concluded that in this presidential period a policy has been intensified that, through a human rights narrative, restricts certain flows, increasing irregularity and the precariousness of the crossings, consequences that contradict the premise of “orderly, safe and regular migration” on which the government administration is based. This dynamic has been strongly expressed in the Tarapacá Region, a territory that has become the epicenter of the migratory situation.