(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Valentin, Gabriel
This article presents and distinguishes measures that were traditionally all located within the precautionary genre, but that in recent years have attempted to be identified with greater precision. The distinction between these measures is relevant, among other reasons because their requirements are not identical, not all of them are admitted in the same cases and the procedure to adopt them must be different, for clearly justified reasons. The topic is approached in an exploratory manner, based on the selection of the Peruvian and Uruguayan systems.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Martín Diz, Fernando
The change in the justice model is a reality. This change is totally determined by the emergence of new disruptive technologies and, mainly, by the possible integration of artificial intelligence solutions in the judicial process in functions of assistance to the judiciary. We are probably facing a new justice: hybrid justice. A procedural justice in which, from the non-negotiable supervision by a human (judge), technological applications will have an increasing role in the procedural activity, with the demands of legality and respect for fundamental rights as axes that enable their use with all the guarantees.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Valenzuela, Gabriella; Cavani, Renzo
This article aims to criticize the so-called “assertion theory” of civil procedure standing to sue, accepted by a significant part of the Peruvian jurisprudence, and consecrated by the Peruvian Civil Procedure Code. The paper seeks to show that this theory should be discarded since it has several conceptual problems, furthermore, it is not capable of giving an account of actual judicial practice when analyzing and deciding on the presence or absence of standing to sue. This becomes more noticeable in the field of judicial enforcement, and, to that extent, an example of corporate spin-off will be given to show that proving the existence of standing to sue concerning enforcement title can be complex, but that is essential for the judge to carry out this analysis.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Alfaro Valverde, Luis
The data contained in computer and technological devices are increasingly used as evidence in judicial processes, being decisive in the final decisions of judges. This is the so-called computer test. These are often valued uncritically as mere documentary evidence, without considering, among other things, their vulnerable and complex nature. Among the different problems that exist about this test, this study focuses specifically on those related to its reliability. Firstly, the aspects related to the nature of the computer test are examined, as well as its rational assessment. Then, the central question of its reliability is reviewed, related to the risk of its manipulation and its impact on it. Finally, some instruments are analyzed that allow their reliability to be adequately managed, such as expertise, the electronic signature and the intermediation of the notary in the certification of digital evidence.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Guayacán Ortiz, Juan Carlos
The application of new technologies in the judicial process is a practice that became more common after the 2020 pandemic. This article analyzes 3 of the main vicissitudes that the use of these technologies has generated in Colombian judicial processes: as the sending of memorials through data messages, in relation to the so-called automatic notice of service, and about the vicissitudes that are occurring in virtual or digital hearings.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-09-05) Mendoza Díaz, Juan
The work develops the scenario that is generated in Cuba from 2019, when a new Constitution is approved, which abrogates the one in force since 1976. The new text regulates, for the first time, the effective judicial protection and due process within the chapter dedicated to the Guarantees of Rights and orders the ordinary legislator to dictate new rules of development in the different procedural areas, in charge of regulating the catalog of the new rights recognized in the Constitution. Derived from the constitutional mandate, Law No. 141, of October 28, 2021, “Procedural Code”, was enacted to regulate the processing of civil, family, commercial, labor and social security matters. The new Code, which breaks with the regulatory system of the preceding law, introduces a broad catalog of ordering and investigative powers, which are attributed to a model of judge described as “active”, whose powers are deployed throughout the new regulatory text and cover all procedural actions.