Derecho PUCP. Núm. 81 (2018)

URI permanente para esta colecciónhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/179986

Tabla de Contenido


Sección Principal
  • Dos tesis de H.L.A. Hart sobre responsabilidad y castigo: 50 años después Figueroa Rubio, Sebastián; Torres Ortega, Ilsse Carolina; 9-46
  • Dogmática funcionalista y política criminal: una propuesta fundada en los derechos humanos Zúñiga Rodríguez, Laura; 47-92
  • Dominio sobre la vulnerabilidad del bien jurídico o infracción del deber en los delitos especiales Schünemann, Bernd; 93-112
  • El decomiso de bienes relacionados con el delito en la legislación penal peruana García Cavero, Percy; 113-146
  • El uso de drones en España: el ámbito espacial de la ley penal Ruiz-Morales, Manuel Luis; 137-162
  • La caracterización del feminicidio de la pareja o expareja y los delitos de odio discriminatorio Pérez Manzano, Mercedes; 163-196
  • Prevención de riesgos laborales y derecho penal Oré Sosa, Eduardo; 197-225
  • El deber de gestión del riesgo de corrupción en la empresa emanado de la ley 20393 de Chile: especial referencia a las exigencias de identificación y evaluación de riesgo Artaza, Osvaldo; Galleguillos, Sebastián; 227-262

  • Miscelánea
  • La bolsa de valores de Colombia, su naturaleza y su posición sobre las sociedades comisionistas de bolsa: el planteamiento del Service Level Agreement (SLA) como posible forma de mitigación Rodríguez Rodríguez, Néstor David; 265-302
  • La tutela cautelar en el contencioso-administrativo de Nicaragua Arríen Somarriba, Juan Bautista; 303-339
  • La dependencia: un nuevo riesgo de la seguridad social chilena Arellano Ortiz, Pablo; 341-360
  • Convergencias y divergencias del derecho de incumplimiento del Código Civil alemán con los Principios de Derecho Europeo de los Contratos y otros textos internacionales Barcia Lehmann, Rodrigo; Rivera Restrepo, José Maximiliano; 361-403
  • Blockchain y mercados financieros: aspectos generales del impacto regulatorio de la aplicación de la tecnología blockchain en los mercados de crédito de América Latina Corredor Higuera, Jorge Armando; Díaz Guzmán, David; 405-439

  • Interdisciplinaria
  • La regla de oferta final en el panel eléctrico chileno Carrasco Delgado, Nicolás Ignacio Ariel; 443-461
  • Venga a nosotros tu reino: la justicia como fuerza anímica ausente en la enseñanza del derecho Del Mastro Puccio, Fernando; 463-510
  • Explorar

    Resultados de Búsqueda

    Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
    • Ítem
      Dogmática funcionalista y política criminal: una propuesta fundada en los derechos humanos
      (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2018-11-28) Zúñiga Rodríguez, Laura
      In this paper I intend to reflect on the inability of functionalist dogmatic currents to contain the ius puniendi of the State. I will also point out what are the reasons of the penal system itself that have led to give the legislator a carte blanche, which has led to an unbridled punitiveness, and what fundamentals are proposed to build a more rational criminal response. By reviewing the current situation of criminal dogmatics, the questions of the method and the object of study of this branch of knowledge, we come to the conclusion of an improper relativism of a knowledge that is intended to be scientific. The rational proposal against this relativism is a criminal policy based on human rights.
    • Ítem
      Dominio sobre la vulnerabilidad del bien jurídico o infracción del deber en los delitos especiales
      (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2018-11-28) Schünemann, Bernd
      What is the basis of the crimes perpetrated by State officials (special delicts)? The answer to this question was not always important in the history of the penal doctrine, because only from the work of Claus Roxin was renewed the debate on this type of crimes. The different positions in discussion take their arguments back to the very same concept of a punishable act, whether it is understood as the injury of an interest or as the injury to the validity of the rule. Peru has not been a scenario alien to this debate, since the arguments of the various Supreme Court rulings in the proceedings against Fujimori give proof of this. In this article, it is argued that most special delicts should be understood as special guarantor crimes, because their authors, far from violating a duty, actually have control over the vulnerability of an interest, or over the supervision of a source of danger. This position, which starts from understanding crime as the injury of a legal right, considers that the margin of crimes of duty infringement is very reduced and, most of the times, it does not receive a criminal response. In this way, the position led by Günther Jakobs, which understands crime as an injury to the validity of the rule and, therefore, to special delicts, such as those based on the violation of a special institutional duty, suffers from two conceptual vacuums. On the one hand, it has not been able to outline a necessary differentiation between internal and external duties of an institution. On the other hand, it has not been able to explain why or how the individual injury of an institutional duty could harm the institution as a whole. Finally, we analyze the consequences of these approaches for the dogmatics of authorship and participation, the advantages and disadvantages of the reception of these perspective in the Peruvian and German legal systems; as well as, the validity of functionalism and the problem of private participant.