(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2020-05-29) Téllez Carvajal, Evelyn
The aim of this article is to provide the reader a documentary record on the subject of the technological infrastructure and the knowledge management of big data analytics and their relation to human rights.
Currently, human rights violations around the world due to the indiscriminate use of big data analytics is a constant, since the information that is generated every day and every second by the use of technological devices —such as smartphones— makes possible the collection of information, that goes from consumption data to even private information, such as religious opinions or biometric data. Human rights violations due to big data analytics starts by the way personal data is collected and treated. Sometimes people do not know how their data are being processed, stored or used.As a result of the analysis, it was observed that several articles, books and papers refer to personal data and privacy regulations, focusing in the regulations of the data mining conditions. Despite, those regulations, it can be observed that big data analytics could allow a wide margin for infringement of not only the human right to privacy, but also of another human rights; for instance, through actions that promote racism, the creation of blacklists, the promotion of segregation and the limit of the freedom of speech, just to mention some examples.
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editorial, 2020-05-29) Franco García, Devora; Quintanilla Perea, Alejandro
In 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union recognized the right to be forgotten based on the interpretation of a regulatory framework related to the protection of personal data. Over time, many Latin American countries, including Peru, have enacted laws regulating the processing of personal data. The Directorate for the Protection of Personal Data of Peru, from the entry into force of Law N° 29733, Protection of Personal Data Law, has recognized the exercise of the right to be forgotten and has ordered the de-indexing from search engine content. On the other hand, in the Inter-American Human Rights System, through the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, this right has been rejected. This is because, as it has been conceived in the European system, freedom of expression would be illegitimately restricted. This article aims to analyze the content of the right to be forgotten, as well as the limitations that must be observed at the time of recognition. Likewise, the challenges faced by this right in the Peruvian regulatory system will be evidenced, considering the criteria adopted by the Constitutional Court of Peru, as well as those adopted within the Inter-American Human Rights System.