Explorando por Autor "Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Texto completo enlazado
El Cuarto Pleno Casatorio Civil vs. los Plenos Jurisdiccionales: desencuentros, contradicciones e incertidumbre. Necesitamos un nuevo pleno casatorio sobre la posesión precaria
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2023-08-16) Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
The Fourth Casatory Plenary has encountered significant challenges due to the evolving circumstances. Throughout the past decade, a series of Jurisdictional Plenary Sessions have emerged, some of which have addressed issues that were not examined during the Fourth Plenary (such as the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judges to adjudicate precarious eviction cases or the potential waiver of conciliation in evictions arising from lease agreements with forfeiture clauses). Moreover, certain conclusions reached in these sessions openly contradict the precedents established in the Fourth Plenary (including the prescriptive period applicable to eviction claims or the possessory title in eviction lawsuits filed against family members).The current situation bears resemblance to the environment in which the Fourth Plenary was conducted, characterized by: (i) divergent perspectives on various aspects concerning precarious possession, (ii) a lack of certainty regarding the resolution of everyday challenges, (iii) inconsistent verdicts on identical matters and (iv) a pervasive atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability to the detriment of the litigants.An imperative exists for a new casatory plenary session focused on precarious possession that, akin to the Fourth Plenary in 2013, enables the restoration of order and furnishes a measure of predictability and certainty, at least in the medium term.
Texto completo enlazado
La prescripción del ‘propietario’ y su impacto en la solución de los problemas vinculados a la determinación del derecho de propiedad
(Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2024-10-17) Pasco Arauco, Alan Augusto
The acquisitive prescription or usucapion turns out to be one of the most important figures in our regulations regarding property. As it turns out, it is not only a way to acquire the domain, but the only reliable way to prove ownership status. Along these lines, the present work makes a study of the concept of usucapion and its function as ‘proof of dominance’. This gives way to an analysis of the argument surrounding the ‘owner’s statute of limitations’, by examining national jurisprudence on the matter.Finally, to expose the practicality in the acceptance and application of the concept at a casuistic level. The author concludes that, through the acceptance of the theory of the ‘owner’s prescription’ and a correct application of it, it is possible to solve a series of controversies linked to the determination of the true owner.