Análisis de la prescripción de la facultad de la Administración Tributaria para exigir el pago de las deudas tributarias en atención a la dación del Decreto Legislativo 1421
No hay miniatura disponible
Fecha
2022-03-24
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
DOI
Resumen
En el presente artículo se analiza el tratamiento de la facultad de la administración
tributaria para el cobro de las deudas tributarias (potestad de exigir el pago) a través de
las diversas modificaciones del Código Tributario que se dieron a dicha potestad. A través
de dicho análisis se evidencia el origen del problema en donde se podrían generar
escenarios en los cuales la administración tributaria podría determinar una deuda, pero no
cobrarla, lo cual llevó a la emisión de una resolución de observancia obligatoria por parte
del Tribunal Fiscal y la posterior emisión del Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1421, norma que
fue bastante mediática y cuestionada por parte de los contribuyentes, lo que llevó a una
demanda de inconstitucionalidad que fue resuelta 2 años después de la emisión de la
norma. Del análisis de las normas emitidas, se determina el origen del problema del plazo
de prescripción de la facultad de la administración tributaria para exigir el pago de deudas
tributarias, iniciándose este con la emisión del Decreto Legislativo Nro. 981, empeorando
con la emisión del Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1113 y siendo finalmente “corregido” a través
del Decreto Legislativo Nro. 1421, norma que finalmente fue validada por una sentencia
del Tribunal Constitucional.
This article analyzes the treatment of the faculty of the tax administration to enforce the collection of tax debts (authority to demand payment) through the several modifications of the Tax Code that were made to such faculty. This analysis shows the origin of the problem, resulting in scenarios in which the tax administration could determine a debt, but not be able to collect it, which led to the issuance of a binding resolution by the Tax Court and the subsequent issuance of Legislative Decree No. 1421, a rule that was highly controversial and questioned by taxpayers, which led to a claim of unconstitutionality that was settled 2 years after the issuance of the rule. From the analysis of the regulations issued, the origin of the problem of the statute of limitations of the power of the tax administration to enforce payment of tax debts is determined, starting with the issuance of Legislative Decree No. 981, getting worse with the issuance of Legislative Decree No. 1113 and finally being "corrected" through Legislative Decree No. 1421, a regulation that was finally validated by a decision of the Constitutional Court.
This article analyzes the treatment of the faculty of the tax administration to enforce the collection of tax debts (authority to demand payment) through the several modifications of the Tax Code that were made to such faculty. This analysis shows the origin of the problem, resulting in scenarios in which the tax administration could determine a debt, but not be able to collect it, which led to the issuance of a binding resolution by the Tax Court and the subsequent issuance of Legislative Decree No. 1421, a rule that was highly controversial and questioned by taxpayers, which led to a claim of unconstitutionality that was settled 2 years after the issuance of the rule. From the analysis of the regulations issued, the origin of the problem of the statute of limitations of the power of the tax administration to enforce payment of tax debts is determined, starting with the issuance of Legislative Decree No. 981, getting worse with the issuance of Legislative Decree No. 1113 and finally being "corrected" through Legislative Decree No. 1421, a regulation that was finally validated by a decision of the Constitutional Court.
Descripción
Palabras clave
Derecho tributario--Legislación--Perú, Administración tributaria--Perú, Deuda
Citación
Colecciones
item.page.endorsement
item.page.review
item.page.supplemented
item.page.referenced
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este artículo se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess