dc.contributor.author | Figueroa, Adolfo Ivan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-25T17:59:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-25T17:59:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-12-29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/26702/26008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/199043 | |
dc.description.abstract | What does the Immanuel kant´s paradox mean for science? Why is the difference between analytic and synthetic sentences-propositions a central puzzle in science, epistemology, analytical philosophy, and philosophy of science? These inquiries entail a profound research on the foundation of philosophy and science. Despite all this necessary endeavor, this brief article focuses on the case Popper-Figueroa with the purpose to highlight the basic philosophical challenges regarding the construction of the bedrock - the substantiality of ontology- or the substratum in the scientific process. | en_US |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:2304-4306 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | urn:issn:0254-4415 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | * |
dc.source | Economía; Volume 46 Issue 92 (2023) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Refutability | en_US |
dc.subject | Risk | en_US |
dc.subject | Foundation | en_US |
dc.title | The Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroa | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type.other | Artículo | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.01 | |
dc.publisher.country | PE | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202302.001 | |