Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorMerino, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSosa, Juan Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-17T15:20:00Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17T15:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/economia/article/view/22814/21914
dc.description.abstractAround half of Peru’s public investment is made by local governments. Through the estimation of a dynamic panel data model for 1796 local governments between 2010 and 2018, we find that the most important drivers for local public investment are: (i) availability of funding sources, especially those associated to non-renewable natural resource revenues; (ii) variables associated with each local government’s capacity to plan, budget and execute public investment; and (iii)  political budget cycle effects, especially during the year following local elections. Furthermore, we extend our analysis by differentiating between local governments with reelected and non-reelected authorities, and by grouping local governments according to their economic size. Most of our results are shown to be robust across different specifications. Results from this paper can be used as a starting point to design mechanisms that make public investment more stable and predictable in a context where reelection banning can further deepen public investment’s fall.en_US
dc.description.abstractAround half of Peru’s public investment is made by local governments. Through the estimation of a dynamic panel data model for 1796 local governments between 2010 and 2018, we find that the most important drivers for local public investment are: (i) availability of funding sources, especially those associated to non-renewable natural resource revenues; (ii) variables associated with each local government’s capacity to plan, budget and execute public investment; and (iii) political budget cycle effects, especially during the year following local elections. Furthermore, we extend our analysis by differentiating between local governments with reelected and non-reelected authorities, and by grouping local governments according to their economic size. Most of our results are shown to be robust across different specifications. Results from this paper can be used as a starting point to design mechanisms that make public investment more stable and predictable in a context where reelection banning can further deepen public investment’s fall.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Fondo Editoriales_ES
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2304-4306
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:0254-4415
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourceEconomía; Volume 43 Issue 86 (2020)es_ES
dc.subjectPublic investmenten_US
dc.subjectSubnational governmentsen_US
dc.subjectPolitical budget cyclesen_US
dc.subjectPublic Investmentes_ES
dc.titleLocal Public Investment Drivers in Perues_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.otherArtículo
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.01
dc.publisher.countryPE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202002.003


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess