Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUrioste Samanamud, Ricardo de
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T21:11:03Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T21:11:03Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/12112/12678
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica del Perúes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1995-2929
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2411-8834
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourceIUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 41 (2010)es_ES
dc.subjectDerechoes_ES
dc.titleTza Yap Shum versus Perú : comentarios sobre un caso CIADI pendientees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.otherArtículo
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
dc.publisher.countryPE


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International