Working Papers

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://54.81.141.168/handle/123456789/141904

Buscamos profundizar y explorar los conocimientos en las áreas y temas relevantes en los negocios discutidos internacionalmente. Nuestra investigación está dirigida para profesionales y stakeholders de todas las industrias e investigadores que busquen fuentes de información en los temas de investigación relevantes e innovadores en los negocios.

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Conflict

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A proposed framework for solving conflicts of mining projects
    (CENTRUM Publishing, 2015) Álvarez, César; Alfaro Paredes, Emigdio Antonio
    The purpose of this paper, is to propose a framework for solving conflicts of mining projects, based on the inclusion of: a) the alignments to the project management framework of the Project Management Institute, b) the implementation of an Integrated Sustainable Development Program, c) a public surrender of accounts, and d) the continuous audit processes by internal institutions and by external, independent and international institutions. This proposed framework was contextualized to the Tía María mining project in Peru; also, a generic solution framework is presented. Finally, some recommendations for future researches were proposed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Behavioural Dynamic Model of Consensus, Cohesion, Conflict and Potency of Top Management Teams in a Textile and Apparel Sector
    (CENTRUM Publishing, 2015) Chang, Luis; Alfaro Paredes, Emigdio Antonio; Marquina Feldman, Percy
    This research studied the relationships among the consensus, the cohesion, the conflict and the potency of the top management teams in a textile and apparel sector. In order to achieve its goal, this study used four validated scales: (a) Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises Scale for measuring consensus, (b) Perceived Cohesion Scale for measuring cohesion, (c) Interpersonal Conflict Scale for measuring conflict, and (d) Guzzo, Yost, and Campbell Scale for measuring potency. The conclusions were the following: (a) by well managing cohesion, consensus and conflict, the top management team can acquire potency, (b) the used scales with small changes are appropriate for evaluating the constructs, and (c) the proposed model was validated, with the precision that the influence of cohesion by itself seems not too important. Finally, some topics were suggested for future researches.